Browsed by
Author: Paul Luvera

Luvera practiced plaintiff law 55 years. He is past President of the Inner Circle of Advocates & Washington State Trial Lawyers Association. Member ABOTA, American College of Trial Lawyers, International Academy, International Society of Barristers and the American Trial Lawyers Hall of Fame. Book Luvera on Advocacy available at Trial Guides Publishing Email paul@luvera.org
DEALING WITH THE “ERROR OF JUDGMENT” DEFENSE IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES

DEALING WITH THE “ERROR OF JUDGMENT” DEFENSE IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES

A common defense in medical malpractice cases is to assert the cause of the injury was an unintended outcome following medical judgment regarding acceptable choices between alternative medical judgments. Some states, like Washington, approve a jury instruction on this concept. Washington Pattern Jury Instruction 105.08 “Exercise of Judgment” provides: “A physician is not liable for selecting one of two or more alternative [courses of treatment] [diagnoses], if, in arriving at the judgment to [follow the particular course of treatment] [make the particular diagnosis], the…

Read More Read More

    OPENING STATEMENT DAMAGE CONCEPTS

    OPENING STATEMENT DAMAGE CONCEPTS

There are some fundamental legal concepts about damages that should be incorporated in most personal injury damage cases. Some of the more important ones include a factual introduction followed by a clear overview of the law of damages. It is important the jury understands there is only one trial to cover the past, present and the future of damages. A time distinction between these three periods relating to the damage claims should be made clear. The jurors need to understand…

Read More Read More

IDEAS REGARDING JURY SELECTION

IDEAS REGARDING JURY SELECTION

Jury selection has always presented a problem to trial lawyers. Determining the right questions and how to frame them for the issues in the case is a difficult challenge. Under our modern procedure, It has become even more challenging due to the judicially imposed unreasonably short  time limits and the frequent court-imposed process of remote jury selection where the lawyer and the jurors aren’t even in the same room. There is an enormous number of possible questions that might be…

Read More Read More