Browsed by
Author: Paul Luvera

Luvera practiced plaintiff law 55 years. He is past President of the Inner Circle of Advocates & Washington State Trial Lawyers Association. Member ABOTA, American College of Trial Lawyers, International Academy, International Society of Barristers and the American Trial Lawyers Hall of Fame. Book Luvera on Advocacy available at Trial Guides Publishing Email paul@luvera.org
LESSONS FROM THE MAN, HIS SON & THE DONKEY

LESSONS FROM THE MAN, HIS SON & THE DONKEY

I know I’ve written about  this before and that all of  you agree, but the more I observe people in general and young lawyers in particular I think they are trying achieve success  in the wrong way. Great trial lawyers become great not by learning skills and techniques, but by first learning about themselves and the changes of attitudes they need to make for greatness. Certainly, the first lesson is we have to be true ourselves. As Shakespeare wrote in…

Read More Read More

WHAT DO JURORS WANT TO ACCOMPLISH AS JURORS?

WHAT DO JURORS WANT TO ACCOMPLISH AS JURORS?

Have you ever taken the  time to mentally step into the shoes of your jurors and look at the trial as if you were a juror rather than a lawyer representing a client? We know that  most jurors are asking themselves: “what does the person suing want and what does the other side claim?”  But subconsciously the most basic question they all have is: “what is in this case for me? How does this case affect me, my family and…

Read More Read More

BASIC OUTLINE FOR CROSS EXAMINATION ABOUT WORKER SAFETY

BASIC OUTLINE FOR CROSS EXAMINATION ABOUT WORKER SAFETY

Here’s a very simple outline for cross  examination about worker safety. You would add  to this relevant information and discovery from the case. It’s a start,  however, for you to consider and  improve upon: WARNING-SAFETY CROSS EXAMINATION GENERAL OUTLINE  COLLATERAL ATTACK ELIMINATING OR MINIMIZING RISK OF SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH  TRUE THAT TEXACO SHOULD HOLD PARAMOUNT THE SAFETY AND HEALTH OF IT’S WORKERS? AGREE WITH THE PROPOSITION THAT: ANY RISK OF SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR DEATH IS ALWAYS UNACCEPTABLE IF REASONABLE…

Read More Read More