Category Archives: Settlement

HOW TO WRITE A SETTLEMENT DEMAND LETTER

There are a lot of ways you can write a settlement demand letter and some demands are by DVD instead of just a letter. One format I’ve followed for a demand letter in a typical personal injury case is to outline what I think the carrier wants to know. I supplement this letter with documentation. The more paper you send the more likely to settle, at least in the less major cases. I usually enclose a copy of the letter with a statement that the copy is provided so they can send this to their client. I want to pressure the ethical obligation of advising clients of settlement offers as in some cases defense counsel just don’t do it.

Here’s my basic outline:

1.  Introduction to letter

There is an introductory paragraph indicating the purpose of the letter and outlining any conditions of settlement such as not agreeing to confidentiality.

2.  Facts of Negligence

Here I insert an outline of the facts. I reference attached police reports, photos, statements and other documentation I am providing. I cite applicable law and outline our claims of negligence. I discuss contributory negligence as well.

3.  Client Background

I provide a history of the clients that is relevant. That would include vital statistics, marital, occupation and the like. I list children and ages and otherwise paint a family history plus the specifics regarding the client.

4.  The Injuries

Here I describe the pre health condition of the client and the injuries received with the impact on the precondition. I attach documentation of medical informaton including hospital information, doctor etc. I usually attach a photo of the client and family.

5.  The Bills

Here I list  the economic loss. The past bills, wage loss and the future as well. I provide documentation of the bills plus economist report and ot her documents to support the economic claim.

6.  Evaluation

In this section I make an evaluation of the case considering the liability, the injuries, the bills and the non-economic loss. I outline the applicable law that applies to the damage case. I make a specific demand for a dollar settlement.

7.  Conclusion

In the final paragraph I advise how long the offer will remain open and discuss any other aspect of the case that should be clarified.

Click here for reuse options!

Copyright 2011 Plaintiff Trial Lawyer Tips

HOW TO EVALUATE A PERSONAL INJURY CASE

How do you evaluate a  damage case? That is a problem we all have as
witnessed by the unwelcome adverse verdict. There is no perfect answer, but
there are some guidelines. We know that the best method is through properly conducted focus studies. We can also discuss with as many non lawyer friends who are willing to listen as we can find. Asking advice of lawyers is a hit and miss
approach as lawyers don’t think like jurors and it depends who you ask.  You can check other verdicts, but that is the least accurate method unless you have a sufficient number in the same venue to have some degree of  assistance.

We do know there are some basics. Every injury cases rests
on three legs, like a stool: (1) liability (2) damages and (3)
collectability.  If you were to make that a checklist it might look something like this using a rating scale of one to five.

1.  LIABILITY

  • How bad is the negligient action
  • How clearly can it be proven
  • What impression does plaintiff make
  • What impression does defendant make
  • What impression do key liability witness make
  • How strong  is the evidence of contributory negligence
  • How do the case facts appeal to juror basic values
  • Do the case facts have application to community protection issues

2.  DAMAGES

  • How serious are the injuries
  • How large is the eonomic loss
  • How clearly can the injuries be proven
  • What impression does plaintiff make regarding injuries claimed
  • What impresion do treating medical providers make
  • What impression do lay witnesses make

3.  COLLECTIBILITY

  • How much insurance coverage is there
  • Is there a bad faith potential claim
  • Are there any other policies
  • Are there assets that are available
  • Are there other potential defendants with coverage

To complete the evaluation you would next consider the probable range of economic loss the jury would award. Remember, the test is: How much money is a jury in the venue where I will try this case likely to award? You trying the case in that place. Not some other lawyer in some other state or venue,  Then look at life espectancy and your overeall evaluation made above as to non-economic loss. What is the probale range. Keep in mind you need to discount the probable range by the risk of loss and problems you have identified above. You have to apply subjective evaluation to end up with a range of verdict.  Settlement evaluation involves a bell curve like consideration.  There is a low  and a high probaility with a mid range.  In negotiation you keep this in mind.

This is a very simple way of evaluation and not extremely accurate bexause so much of it is subjective with no real formula. Do not overlook internet focus services as one helpful assistance to you and focus studies in general are the better method of evaluation.

Click here for reuse options!

Copyright 2011 Plaintiff Trial Lawyer Tips

Settlement forms to consider

With regard to settlement negotiation I like to have a basic form letter to my client where I outline information about the matter. By having it a form I eliminate the problem of overlooking something I should say and it gives me an opportunity to add or revise for the particular case. I’m giving you an example of a letter to the client about this.

In addition, I want written settlement authority from my client for any settlement we made. This avoids the potential for misunderstanding and protects me against later "buyer remorse" issues with clients. I’ve included a basic simple form for this purpose.

I like t o keep track of the negotiation process on a form designed for this purpose rather then making random notes on a yellow pad. This gives me a permanent record of what went on during the negotiation process. I’ve included a form for this purpose as well in the materials below.

Dear….

We have agreed with the representatives of the defendants to attempt to settle your case through a process called "mediation." This involves agreeing to an impartial third person who will assist the parties in attempting to reach a settlement of your case.

There are many advantages to this procedure, but in your case the primary one is the increased chance of settlement for the maximum amount possible by using an impartial third person as the mediator. Mediation allows both sides to give their position confidentially to the mediator in order to help them understand how best to settle the case. It allows the defense to "save face" in agreeing to a settlement they might not otherwise agree to by relying upon the mediator’s recommendation.

Both sides will submit in advance to the mediator information about our case and our position. The mediator will review this in advance of the meeting. You need not bring anything with you dealing with your case unless you feel there is something important we have not provided the mediator.

There is nothing to be lost by this process except time. If we can’t agree nothing that is said or provided can be used against us at trial. Everything is confidential. In general, we have had very good success in mediating cases like yours and feel it should be attempted here.

There are several things you should know:

1. Be sure to bring reading material with you. The process involves a group meeting first and then separating the attorneys and clients for parties in different rooms. You and I will be in one room and the defendants and their attorneys plus insurance representatives in another. The mediator goes back and forth in communicating negotiation. There are often long delays while the mediator is talking to the other side. The process can take a full day so be prepared to stay.

2. No settlement will be made without your approval. You are present for all stages of discussion involving our case and the mediator. The mediator can only communicate offers and make recommendations. They cannot force you to settle your case. We will have plenty of opportunity to discuss offers and what is happening during this procedure. You have the final say so on settlement. Your attorney will be there to assist you, but the final decision is yours.

3. This is not a trial. All of the information is provided in advance and the balance is given at the time of meetings. There is a brief initial meeting at which all sides can make general statements about the case but no argument and no witnesses are called. You will not be questioned as a witness, although the mediator may ask you some general questions about facts not provided in the written materials.

You should dress as if you were going to trial as the impression you make can have a bearing particularly if the insurance representative will be seeing you for the first time.

We are providing information about where this will take place and when to meet the attorney. If you have questions would you please advise me.

CLIENT SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY
CLIENT:

We hereby authorize our attorneys to submit a demand for full settlement of our case. We understand fees, costs, unpaid medical expense, interest due, subornation, liens, amounts due others and all expenses owed will be deducted from any gross settlement amount we authorize. We hereby authorizes gross settlement of the entire case for not less than $ .

Note: Settlement demand range $ ___________________to $ ____________________________

Comment:_____________________________________________________________________

X ___________________________________________________________________________
Date: / /
X___________________________________________________________________________
Date: / /
————————————————————————————————————————

Plaintiff
Defendant:

DATE

AMOUNT

Amnt. Less

DATE

AMOUNT

Amnt. More

1.

$

$

1.

$

$

2.

$

$

2.

$

$

3.

$

$

3.

$

$

4.

$

$

4.

$

$

5.

$

$

5.

$

$

6.

$

$

6.

$

$

7.

$

$

7.

$

$

8.

$

$

8.

$

$

9.

$

$

9.

$

$

10.

$

$

10.

$

$

11.

$

$

11.

$

$

Defendant:_____________ Defendant:__________________

DATE

AMOUNT

Amnt. More

DATE

AMOUNT

Amnt. More

1.

 

 

1

 

 

2

 

 

2

$

 

3

 

 

3

 

 

4

 

 

4

 

 

5

 

 

5

 

 

6

 

 

6

 

 

7

 

 

7

 

 

Click here for reuse options!

Copyright 2009 Plaintiff Trial Lawyer Tips