TRIAL PRACTICE AND COURT RULES

A few years ago I was invited to speak to the trial judges in Washington State. I decided to tell them the truth as I saw it. The applause was light sparse and unenthusiastic. I’ve never been invited to give a talk since that time.

The other day my partner showed me one of the local rules in King County and I was reminded of the unpopular talk I had given. So, I’m going to outline y talk here because I feel as strongly now as I did when I gave the talk those several years ago. Not only that, the situation hasn’t improved, it has become worse and more complex. So here's an outline of that talk even though it won't do any good.

The first thing I told the trial judges was that "less is better then more" when it comes to creating rules. After all God gave Moses only ten commandments that governed the entire rules for society. The Lord’s prayer has only sixty six words and the speech that has remained one of the most famous and moving speeches of our history is the Gettysburg Address. Lincoln used only two hundred and eight six words. We live in a time when the nation’s tax laws are some six times longer then Tolstoy’s War and Peace as well as being considerably harder to understand.

We not only have to comply with rules adopted by our state Supreme Court governing the practice of trial law, but rules every county in the state has adopted. They call them "local rules," but the local rules have consumed the Supreme Court rules and failure to comply is just as fatal as a violation of the Supreme Court rules.

Worse, the enforcement of the rules by the trial judges seems to be taken from Dr. Eric Berne’s 1964 book Games People Play and the chapter: "I’ve Got You Now You Son of a Bitch." Instead of these local rules assisting or improving the processing of cases they have become a series of obstacles to overcome or suffer sanctions. The result is that the local rules have become not just a hindrance and trap for the unwary, but are time consuming and add expense.

Noah would never have been allowed to build his ark in this legal environment. There would have been rules of all kinds governing everything he was trying to do and making all kinds of objections as he did it.

There is a story about the famous comedian W.C. Fields who was an avowed atheist, but was observed one day reading a Bible. When asked what he was doing, he replied "Looking for loopholes, looking for loopholes." That’s what excessive of rules do to the law practice when lawyers, faced with a volume of rules begin looking for ways around them.

With a multitude of rules to comply with in processing a case for a client, we are forced to become pencil pushers with green eye shades laboring over dots, comas & period marks. We need a set of Ten Commandments in the practice of trial work and we don’t need the U.S. Tax Code to do it right.  I think we need to remember why we have a judicial system and jury system. It is not for the benefit of the trial lawyers or the judges. It's primary purpose is to benefit the people who are in the system as clients and who are looking to the system for justice. That's where our focus should be.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 12/19/2009 11:24 AM David Crump wrote:
    Here here! I agree 100% Thank you for telling the trial judges what they did not want to hear. In every case I find rules that seem to make no sense. Now I do like the idea of a civil case calendar, but believe that some of the items required add nothing to case development that cannot or should not already be obtained or provided. My pet peeve is "justice delayed" ... the single most frustrating element of the practice for me. My second pet peeve is "make work", having to be compliant with unnecessary (in my view) rules and requirements that only serve (again, in my view) to bloat the bureaucracy and increase the inefficiency in an already burdened system. I agree less is more.
    Reply to this
  • 12/19/2009 2:30 PM pat trudell wrote:
    Another practical common sense post Paul.
    I am reminded of the quote from the late Justice Brennan:"All cases should be tried on their merits."
    A wise judge follows this mandate and places substance over form.
    Reply to this
  • 12/21/2009 8:02 AM Jerry Perry wrote:
    This is all so true. I remember when I tried cases with two brown expandable folders, one for plaintiff's case and one for defendant's. Now I worry over the "gotcha" of the judges. It really does seem like they work for the insurance company and the prosecutor. Now I have many banker boxes to try the same case. I applaud you and those like you for your positvie outlook. I am glad that I am not a new attorney wanting to help people get justice. It just won't happen without having a huge reserve.
    Reply to this
  • 12/21/2009 1:56 PM Ron Hammett wrote:
    One very frustrating local rule is the "unpublished" local rule known as the "this is the way we do it here rule" prevalent throughout central Washington.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.