SELF CONTROL IN THE COURT ROOM

 

A friend of mine who is a great trial lawyer has been in a lengthy jury trial with two defense lawyers. The atmosphere in the court room is high octane with the lawyers at each other’s throats. I sent my friend this note. He told me later that he had, with great effort, figured this out himself before I wrote and had managed to get control of himself. I think the advice I gave is right and here it is:

In cultures where there are elders, it is a normal practice that the elder does not give advice unless asked, but here’s my passing uninvited comment anyway.

I've been in blood baths like yours. In fact, in the early days of practice, especially in rural counties, hand to hand combat was not only tolerated but expected. If you were unfortunate enough to get a judge who couldn't control the court room and worse, didn't know evidence rules it was a total circus, like a scene out of an insane asylum. In former years, jurors were entertained by it, but in modern times jurors are generally repelled by chaos and fighting in the court room. Like all of us they don't want to be around people who are disputing with year other.

So, here's my uninvited comment from one who has only spent a few minutes in your courtroom. The question is what do you do about it when all you have to do is to hear the sound of the opponent's footsteps and you are capable of murder? Gerrry Spence's advice to me has been you stop. You draw a contrast between your opponent and your demeanor and conduct. He is a master at patiently waiting through rants. Pausing after it stops and calmly saying something to the judge while smiling. He exhibits total control over himself and as the level increases he becomes more calm and in control. Has great eye contact with the jury during an opponent's rant. While staying strong and firm on his positions he ends up looking so much better then the other guy that he gets the jury approval. He talks about this and what he calls "giving away your power" in a book he wrote on argument. Yes, easier said then done, but Seneca said " He is most powerful who has himself in his power"

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 10/5/2009 7:56 AM Jerry Perry wrote:
    This is probably the most important advice you can give to a new trial attorney. Jurors are everyday people and their perceptions of us lawyers surly are formed by demeanor more than anything else. Once that opinion is formerd --"Blink"-- the filtering process begins in the jurors perception of our story.
    Reply to this
  • 10/5/2009 1:11 PM Trial Lawyer wrote:
    Mr. Luvera, I just wanted to thank you for this blog. It has great advice that helps out a lot. Keep it up, and keep up the good fight. Thanks.
    Reply to this
  • 10/6/2009 11:41 AM Cyn wrote:
    I agree for the most part EXCEPT when the prosecutor is cheating & you can make it clear to the jury. The jury expects you to be angry, and not quietly take it. (Of course, you need "permission" from the jury - the unstated acknowledgement that they condone your ire.)

    I find my statement true IF I am trying the case against an aggressive person. However, if I try a case against a very calm person, then I have to adjust to their demeanor - especially if it is a weak person or pretty female. (I am female so I'm not just being sexist - I "feel" it in the courtroom."

    I believe the best lawyer adjusts to the situation. (I also think one has to not get in repeated trouble with the judge for such behavior. Not to say that sometimes you get in trouble repeatedly & the jury understands that you are the victim . . . another blogspot.)

    Thanks for the spot.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.